Here is a terrific video talking about two of the greatest mathematical problem solvers, Fermat and Andrew Wiles. It is great insight into the life of Wiles, the genius who solved Fermat’s Last Theorem.

Advertisements

September 2, 2010 by Metroplex Math Circle

Here is a terrific video talking about two of the greatest mathematical problem solvers, Fermat and Andrew Wiles. It is great insight into the life of Wiles, the genius who solved Fermat’s Last Theorem.

Advertisements

%d bloggers like this:

on July 13, 2013 at 11:34 am |Peter L. GriffithsFermat’s Last Theorem can be proved by finding the integer nth root of

(p +q)^n -(p -q)^n, without p equalling q.

This involves binomial expansions and distinguishing

rational from irrational numbers, particularly converting the irrational

number of 2^(1/n) into the rational number of 2.

on February 25, 2016 at 11:07 am |Peter L. GriffithsTake the nth root of both sides

[(1 +1/r)^n – (1 -1/r)^n]^1/n = 2^1/n [(n*1)1/r + (n*3) 1/r^3 …]^1/n.

Let r =1, so that p=q. This deliberately converts the 3 term assumption of FLT into 2 terms. Hence when r =1 and p=q, there are just 2 terms,

[(n*1) + (n*3)…..]^1/n = 2^(1- 1/n).

It also follows that provided n is greater than 2 the Pythagorean triples power, and provided the 3 term assumption is restored, [(n*1) 1/r + (n*3)1/r^3 …]^1/n will be less than 2 when multiplied by by 2^1/n. there can only be equality with 2 terms not the the 3 terms assumed in Fermat’s Last Theorem. The Wiles Proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem lacks any explanation of the absence of the power n=2 being the Pythagorean triples situation from the conclusions of FLT. This could mean that the whole proof is wrong particularly since it is only thought to be understood by a small clique of mathematicians.

on March 3, 2017 at 8:06 am |Peter L. GriffithsContaining less than 300 words, my full proof of Fermat’s Last theorem is in the February 2017 issue of M500,